Added: Oct 14, 2008
From: cdk007
Duration: 9:18
Evolution is a scientific THEORY. Theories are supported by MILLIONS of independently verifiable FACTS. To deny evolution is to deny all of those facts and the hundreds of scientific techniques used to observe them. Worse yet, to deny evolution is to deny reason and logic, the core of the scientific method. Creationists are willing to deny all of this for evolution, yet have no problem exploiting the fruits of science for their own benefit, i.e. cars, computers, modern medicine.Just like falling is a fact and gravity is a theory that describes why you fall, organisms evolving and speciating are facts and the theory of evolution explains why. If you are willing to deny evolution, why not gravity, germs, atoms, electricity, etc. They are all theories too.Funny thing is, evolution, both micro and macro, have been directly observed. So to deny evolution is to deny a direct observation. It's the equivalent of denying the sky is blue yet refusing to look up.I should add, scientists do not BELIEVE in evolution. We ACCEPT it because of the enormous pile of data supporting it. Just like we accept that gravity follows an inverse square law, matter is composed of atoms, germs cause disease, and moving electrons constitute electricity. Scientific theories are not a faith. You can test them yourself and falsify them. Do you have faith your computer runs on electrons or do you accept it? Think about it. To download this video go to:http://www.mediafire.com/?bwia12zadw6Learn the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.
Channel: Tech
Tags: creationism data design dna education evolution fact fossil id intelligent logic transitional
Rating: 4.48 (1994 ratings) Views: 77029' favoriteCount='785 Comments: 6325
Stropy7 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Wow, and look who's talking. How do you even know bornondate was insulting Obama for being black? Could it be bornondate is insulting him for being a wacko leftist radical? Or maybe because he had an incredibly racist pastor for twenty years himself? And by all means stereotype bornondate into being "fascist" and "redneck" and a "bigot." Hey, you forgot to call him a Southern inbred gun-totin' Bible preachin' hillbilly! Go actually make something of yourself you sniveling liberal jerk.
Watergun26 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Anybody want some hot videos to jackoff to see my page. The 1st, 4th and 5th are the best. Just turn it up loud and have your pants down to your ankles and enjoy.
EternalSkeptic Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - staphhahaha-taking the high road-calling out the name callers-then "...Go actually make something of yourself you sniveling liberal jerk. "unintentional irony is the best entertainment-
ChairmanKiel Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Um, what facts do you have Renick128? Please tell me. I would loooove to hear them. To try to explain to you the science behind biology would be a complete waste of time, because you wouldn't understand it probably. Or, you would, but would in a delusional fashion, completely ignore it, thinking belief is somehow more powerful than facts.
ChairmanKiel Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - And do you even have a reason to call me an idiot? Please, give me the reason why, and support it with credible evidence, as well as better spelling. What is it that you can point to that I'm an idiot, when you yourself have not even presented a shred of fact, evidence, or proof; of anything on any of your claims. What makes you a real idiot is that you just make statements without backing them up with anything. You would be an -F in a debate class.
ChairmanKiel Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Um, what mistakes? We need to know what we are mistaken about, then you need to prove/show why we are mistaken. Just saying that we've made mistakes without supporting your claim, or even pointing to what they are proves nothing more than you have nothing to say; or that your a liar. So please, tell us what our mistakes are, and give a reason for it. And not a opinion of why, but a fact/evidence of why.
ChairmanKiel Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - LOL, what the fuck are you talking about? Bigfoot? Thats what your argument is about? Um, scientists basically know that bigfoot statistically doesn't exist, since there is no credible evidence to support its existence. And no, i don't watch that shit, because it is shit. Cryptology isn't science. And what the fuck do you know about the past? Do you have any evidence to show what scientists know is wrong?
Stropy7 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - I called you a jerk because you acted like a childish buffoon. Ever hear of something called hypocrisy? It's when you start stereotyping the stereotypers who are not even really stereotyping in the first place. You can't stand a differing opinion and yet you call out those you consider bigots.
ChairmanKiel Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - And where do you see Bigfoot in a science text book, or reference book, where there are credible sources added at the end, that has been peered reviewed? I only ask because you seem to claim that science supports/doesn't know that bigfoot exists, when any credible scientist will laugh at such a silly question. All so called evidence for Bigfoot has been discredited, and shown as false.
XGralgrathor Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - « How do you even know bornondate was insulting Obama for being black? »O, one could interpret what he said in all manner of ways. But I think I came pretty close with my first interpretation.« Hey, you forgot to call him a Southern inbred gun-totin' Bible preachin' hillbilly! »He can spell; I doubt that he's that far gone yet.
XGralgrathor Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - « Go actually make something of yourself you sniveling liberal jerk. »Even though most of the time my country's politics and politicians are a joke, I am glad that at least our system forces us to think beyond the absurdly simplistic positions of conservative vs. liberal, republican vs. democrat, war-loving vs. pacifist, etc. Sometimes I doubt whether you black-and-whitists even know what positions you support.
renick128 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - you have been ill informed on the hole idea that we evoloved. you are confused about God and you do not want to be held accountable for your sin so you cling to your THEORY. how did we get hear. you think a spontainious NOTHING sprung to action and over millions of years we were formed. basicly your saying that we came from nothing. you have no phiscical evidence that really and truly states your, what is prescieved to be right theory. the sun has been shrinking for years. so if you take that
renick128 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - and go backwards in time you get a picture of the sun being way so huge for anything to live on the earth let alone grow. your theory is lke saying im going to go take nothing and give that nothing 4.6 billion years for something to happen. nothing will happen. noah's ark happened about 4.4thousand years ago. the oldest tree 4.4thousand years old the oldest corral reaf 4.4 thousand years old. the oldest desert is 4.4thousand years old. there are just so many facts and things that yuo negate
jtyranus Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "and go backwards in time you get a picture of the sun being way so huge"Wrong. the sun size is somewhat variable. but it was not much bigger than it is now."noah's ark happened about 4.4thousand years ago. the oldest tree 4.4thousand years old the oldest corral reaf 4.4 thousand years old."you are either a liar or completely ignorant and do not know what you are talking about.
jtyranus Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "noah's ark happened about 4.4thousand years ago."actually the oldest tree is a couple hundred years older than that. and it gives no indication having gone through a global flood. in fact no piece of evidence indicates there was a global flood.
brpierce Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Renick,A piece of advice: try mastering the English language before you tackle molecular biology.
brpierce Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "the sun has been shrinking for years..."Oh, dear. Another poor soul who actually thinks Kent Hovind--he of the 58 felony convictions--is a good, honest source of information.Renick, I'm going to explain this in very simple terms: the fact that something is happening today doesn't mean it was always happening. The sun inflates and contracts periodically. (As a side note, Hovind's "evidence" for a shrinking sun was badly flawed and debunked twenty-plus years ago.)
brpierce Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "noah's ark happened about 4.4thousand years ago."Funny--the Egyptians don't seem to have noticed. I wonder why?
bornondate1968 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Because Egyptians are stupid.
brpierce Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "Because Egyptians are stupid."Aaah, yes. Those stupid Egyptians. They just imagined all those dynasties and Pharaohs--in reality, none of them existed, and the entire Egyptian civilization was built after the Flood.Of course, if we accept that there were eight humans immediately after the Flood, that means that Egyptian civilization (including the Pyramids) was built by a population of a few hundred.But, hey! Just because they were stupid doesn't mean they weren't industrious, right?
guitarnoob06 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Its like bornondate tries to be wrong. People like him amaze me.
guitarnoob06 Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - Irony for the day:i meant renick
ProcInc Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "actually the oldest tree is a couple hundred years older than that." Hundred? Isn't there a 9000 year old tree?
jtyranus Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - "Hundred? Isn't there a 9000 year old tree?"technically its a clonal population if i recall. at least thats what the creationists bring up, as if that dismisses the age of it somehow.i was talking about the bristlecone tree.
stirringwater Says:
Oct 14, 2008 - stfup scientist dont even know if bigfoot exist from a fucking picture yet alone know whats in the depths of our seas how they gunna tell us about something that long ago from the past. i bet your one of those dumbasses who watches ''the future is wild'' and believes that shit