Loose Change Final Cut - Official Trailer Videos

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - shooter686:"If you can't find the smoking gun evidence about KSM, then you are either afraid to look, or your CT websites don't want yuo to know"You my friend are fucking hilarious!. No, there will be NO SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE because THAT will point to the Federal govt so I scare the shit outta the population & congress so I can pass laws allowing me to withold evidence re:national security while I point the finger at AQ & UBL!. Meanwhile we are treated to doctored vids of UBL "confessing"!!

shooter686 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - How typical that you make a claim and admit yo have no evidence of that claim.I guess this is the country you want to live in that anybody can make up a story and want people put in jail with ZERO evidence?Sorry, until you find a shred of evidence, you are just making up lies and can't prove a thing. That is why CTists are laughed in the scientific, engineering, demolition, and explosives communities. They can't prove a thing, yet make a lot of noise trying.

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Again, good try shooter. Youre either grasping at straws, or the biggest fucktard around.I explain why YOU havent come up with evidence of AQ & UBL involvement in 9/11 attacks & now you say i'm the one with no evidence...LMAO. If thats the best youve get then youre employer needs to sack you & you need to get the hell off of these forums. You dont have the requisite knowledge & intelligence to argue with me or anybody else of the 9/11 truth movement! Go on run along now!

fireamusmus Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Sky scrapers do not collapse because of fire, if they did plenty would have done before and since. Un-connected buildings (wtc7) do not collapse in exactly the same way when they are only damaged by falling debris. The Pentagon is most definately one of the most heavily protected buildings in the world, I will give $50 to anyone who can throw a rock at it without being caught on CCTV. Why have we not seen the plane?I don't agree with everything said in LC but something aint right

skanka211 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Skanka - Fresh Outlook Instrumental Check It

ryanshaunkelly Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - nader paul kucinich gravelmckinney ventura tooperot tells the truthready for honesty yet?RATM

threbelsheep Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Actually, the first two versions present alot of the same evidence. The re-issue and remaster is the same film with more evidence, more interviews and better made simulations to give a clearer picture and to justify their claim. To think that so many people around the world are brain washed is more bizzare than any 911 conspiracy. It takes nothing more than common sense to refuse all the claims you were spoon fed yourself from the government.

threbelsheep Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Then tell your friends in these communities and the government to give us answers and show us videos and evidence that prove every 911 activist wrong and we have all said before with LC representing this, watch some interviews with the makers and he says, we will happily look at evidence that doesn't support our claim. Till the day we're proven wrong, we will keep making noise fucking trying. we don't know what all these "communities" know, thats what we want to know. Share the knowledge.

unclesamsnephew666 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - in case you missed it, there was more than a fire at the WTC. check the internet, I think you might find video of two fuel-packed commercial airlines slamming into the buildings at about 600mph and at an erratic angle. it's pretty safe to say that a lot of support tresses and other elements of the building structure were damaged when those gigantic fuel-packed airplanes hit the buildings. oh, and 911truthtards are the most gullible imbeciles EVER. like "they" wouldn't come up with a simpler plan

unclesamsnephew666 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - reading through these 911 truthtard postings is a riot. they have nothing, they say nothing, and they are nothing. it is Bush Derangement Syndrome at it's most hilarious. EVERYONE who disagrees is "in on it" and collected a govt check for not believing the truthtards. shooter686 pummels taoaman1 repeatedly with facts and logic. taoaman responds with anger and tears.911 truthtards are the funniest imbeciles on earth. and dylan avery is laughing all the way to the bank from you assholes.

fireamusmus Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - dunno who gave thumbs down coz you comment is entirely valid. i think some of the stuff in loosechange is a loada shite but i have not yet seen/read a reasonable explaination as to why wtc7 collapsed the way it did... nor an explaination for the lack of cctv images at the pentagon building. if there was an 'inside job' i think it was more of an 'allowed to happen' scenario than planned and carried out by the so called insiders

shooter686 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - I think it is funny to see a person that has ZERO experience tell somebody else with ZERO experience anything about 9-11.Why do you think less than .01% of engineers, scientists, architects and 0% of explosives adn demolition experts agree with your CT?Could it be that you really have no real evidence and just have hearsay, guesses, speculation, and every other thing that is not allowed in a court of law?OK, explain how they were able to load the buildings with explosives. Common sense?

shooter686 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Non-answer as usual. We invaded Iraq over AQ? I thought it was WMD's.Maybe you need to refresh your history books. It has been over 5 years ago. Maybe you can look up UNSR 1441 unless Avery told you not t o look it up and stay with what he tells you.

threbelsheep Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - So you think that the most powerful man on the planet of all people doesn't have the cababilaty to load a tower with explosives? Thats an even more bizzare CT. Im not trying to tell you something i think is the truth, i have my beleif's and you have yours, but why people should be so ignorant as not to ask questions as to why we're really fighting.

weedtroll420 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Here's my thing, why won't they answer our questions? If they answered our questions, and showed us the physics and reason beind their version of events then maybe this wouldnt be an issue....Bush said it himself, "a country that hides something, is a country that is afraid of getting caught." Just answer the physics questions. Explain your story.

theairupthere8 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - Dylan Avery is better than Hilary Clinton about talking a whoooooole lot without saying anything.

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - unclesamsnephews:"shooter686 pummels taoaman1 repeatedly with facts and logic. taoaman responds with anger and tears"Goddam....I thought I told U kids not to bother me until you can stop lying & shooting your moths off with unsupportable arguments. Now go on back to momma dubya, im sure he's gotta dick for you to hold you over!

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - shooter:"We invaded Iraq over AQ? I thought it was WMD's"Officially it was WMD. Unofficially, people like cheney, Rumsfeld, RICE were working like hell to try & make a link between 9/11 & Saddam Hussein & AlQaeda. How else to get us into Iraq when that was their focus before he was even inaugurated as President?. Just do a little research on Cheney's & Rumsfeld's statements on this subject then get to me when youve finished that little project, OK? boy!

unclesamsnephew666 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - "...not to bother me until you can stop lying & shooting your moths off with unsupportable arguments"hilarious, coming from a 911truthtard. unsupportable arguments? you mean like "fire can't melt steel"? the #1 truthtard talking point and utter bullshit since it doesn't have to melt to fail. (ever hear of welding?)"im sure he's gotta dick for you to hold you over"and the truthtards' juvenile use of homosexuality as an insult continues unabated. says a lot about the truthtard mentality.

unclesamsnephew666 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - taoaman1: Officially it was WMD.LMFAO!!! are you really that stupid? do you really believe the "official" reason we went into iraq was WMDs only?just when you think 911truthtards have hit the rockbottom of stupidity, jerkoffs like taoaman1 shuffle in with even deeper depths of idiocy."How else to get us into Iraq when that was their focus before he was even inaugurated as President?"but wasn't the 911 "inside job" all that was neded to justify invasion? get your story straight, jerkoff.

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - unclesamsnephews: ALL THE ABOVE - JERKOFF!!

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - unclesam:"you mean like "fire can't melt steel"? the #1 truthtard talking point and utter bullshit since it doesn't have to melt to fail. (ever hear of welding?)"So how did the wtc towers collapse oh "professor of wtc tower collapses"??

unclesamsnephew666 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - you put "professor of wtc tower collapses" in quotes. who said that? when did I claim I was that? are straw man tactics the best you've got? or do you just lose it even more when you are reminded of the fact that the #1 truthtard talking point is obvious and blatant bullshit?still, you have to want to be fooled to not figure that a 120+ ton aircraft, full of fuel, hitting it at 600mph at an erratic angle ripping through infrastructure and the resulting fire is what made it collapse. u idiot.

taoaman1 Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - unclesam:"you have to want to be fooled to not figure that a 120+ ton aircraft, full of fuel, hitting it at 600mph at an erratic angle ripping through infrastructure and the resulting fire is what made it collapse"I knew it!. Youre nothing but a major talking ass wasting time & space on these boards!!. I must be a jerk for taking U so seriously. Now fuck-off you goddammed wanker!!!

usnutter Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - AlQaeda is a front for the CIA. AlQaeda had been groomed & built-up as a classic patsy over 20yrs at least, to carry out attacks against the USA. The Bush family have been friends of the Bin Laden's for decades. 9/11 was the mother of all false-flag attacks on America & George W Bush & the puppeteers of his administration stood to gain from it!!Wake Up People - reclaim our country!!!