Added: Nov 18, 2008
From: Proverbs13i16
Duration: 10:29
From 1969, but still very relavent today.Noam Chomsky debates William F. Buckley.Part 2 is herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Samvw6Z08Who is Noam Chomsky?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChomskyWho is William F. Buckley?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F_Buckley
Channel: Howto
Tags: 1969 buckley bush chomsky debate iraq noam terrorism terrorist
Rating: 4.90 (1290 ratings) Views: 471910' favoriteCount='2624 Comments: 25
alainbreton Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I wish we could see real debates like this in our days...
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Your vestigial buttocks, your finely manicured hands, your ape tufted hair. You sir, are a Drag-Queen among men with a coiffure of the finest baboon ass stubble.
hypocrita Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - 4:10Buckley thinking "I'll get you!".Idiot.
MaxTallon Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - ciejoh: Hello againMany, many thanks for your numerous replies which I have enjoyed immensely: I'm actually surprised replied, as I didn't expect you to take the bait.
ciejoh Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - ludachris475,I am amused. Your comments exude a fixation on matters of male anatomy and sodomy. Imputing your desires to me is curious. As for me, I AM handsome, virile, vigorous, and eschew female habiliments.
jereuter01 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Buckley was a pompous, stuttering, eyebrow raising ass who uses long-winded sentences to obfuscate every issue and Chomsky challenges Buckley repeatedly for twisting history, over simplification and outright incorrect statement of historical facts. What's outright amazing is that with the Internet, one can research quickly the many topics discussed here and clearly see Buckley's ignorance and breezy statements for what they are" poppycock.
replikant0101 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - the reason i like buckley and technocrats like them is their unapologetic approach to their platforms. i respect that. i usually do not agree with them. but someone that sticks with their side is better than anyone who jumps around because it may harm their "reputation".
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - So, you admit that you eschew females and drape yourself in sissy apparel?Your account for this is more ambiguous than explanatory while your fascination with the excretory functions of the mentulla is highly suspect.You sir, are a fascist thug with a comb-over.May you choke on cock.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - This man is a worthless paedophile.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Monica Lewinsky...Was an Inside Blowjob.
rokurota88 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Watching these two guys debate makes me actually believe in the romantic notion of the decline of american culture. They're both so intelligent and informed and matching each other step for step on every issue in a respectful, professional manner, it makes you want to flush bill o' reilly, hannity, limbaugh along with michael Moore, Olberman, Franken straight down the toilet. This is the type of discourse that you don't see anywhere in america today, absolutely not on T.V.
znamrennug Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - rebelmusicfan,There is no good old 'conservatism' to go back to. From start to finish, every brand of conservatism is morally repugnant. It is an arrogant, pretentious, self-righteous, vain, elitist, egotistical, anti-scientific, irrational, racist, dishonest, collectivist and hypocritical philosophy.
bertiethetoupee4 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Chomsky is so clever. Buckley is no match
crisis123456789 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - i do agree with you to some extent. But buckley's style is hardly more respectful or professional than O'Reilly, even if there is alot more intellectualism.
MaxTallon Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - ciejoh:Praise from Caeser, my good man. ;)
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Ciejoh, you are a walking, talking advertisement for sodomy.Bestiality, I find, is best suited to your nature. Perhaps this accounts for your despotic behavior. You are also a filthy libertine. This is not purely a moral indictment for such habits of the butt were encouraged by Royal Charter among the first colonial burgesses. Homos populated the colony of Roanoke galore and were employed in various New England legislatures, according to an extant account by presbyter, Cotton Mather.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - It was not until the 17th century that homos were used purely as ballasts to be shot from British cannons to sink Spanish galleons in Antigua. Such a practice was common among Her Majesty's admiralty to inhibit mercantile sodomy and other wanton indulgences of the crotch. This became the standard of all vessels in Her Majesty's merchant fleet in the Antilles and elsewhere among regular vessels and persons of inferior rank, to regiment men from perpetual sodomy and mutiny of the groin.
LuxuriousLeonard Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Buckley own'd.
znamrennug Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Will those discussing the gay issue please take their debate elsewhere. Posts here should pertain to this video. And for the record, it is possible to use fancy language and still be distasteful.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - This argument is relegated hitherto to matters of the butt.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - A true eugenicist eschews all such inferior types from procreation. Thomas Malthus, the economist for the British East India Company, regimented the diets of homos by observing their habits and dispositions at a distance. Hybrids were bred and crossbred and encouraged to crossdress. Their gametes were collected in petri dishes and siphoned out in order to predict the ratio of pederastic phenotypes and those of dubious distinction.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - At a cursory glance sodomy is elemental.It occurs on the haploid phase of mitosis and latter gestation before degenerating into anal intercourse. Benjamin Franklin conducted experiments on the nascient sodomus cell. Franklin, like other Freemasons, was obsessed with the idea of isolating sodomy to its bare essentials.
eternalwanker Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Chomsky own'd.
bertly71 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - What a great discussion from two great minds. So enjoyable to hear when we are stuck in the sound byte and sloganeering politics of today.
ludachris475 Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Ciejoh,All that I am saying is that your sexual orientation is of dubious derivation.