Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing Videos

MorituriMax Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - neal will probasbly say that a circle on an expanding surface naturally compresses to an oval.how? A Wizard Did It.

EdgeStormcrow Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - I think that this theory can be put as 'plausable'.

OverlordShamala Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - What is YOUR evidence of low density bones on dinasours And birds.What does boiling a pot of water has to do with what its being discussed here in the 1st place. You're on drugs or something? You're the one who brought it up in the 1st place dude. So I made a silly sarcastic remark.You have no idea about science, you go around redefining words, making things up, & rejecting proven facts. Plus you believe in magic. You haven't even made a rebuttal that you are after all a creationist.

OverlordShamala Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Arqueologist & biologist have shown the bones of dinosaurs were porous, like those of birds. The reason you reject that is what? Does that evidence conflict to a certain book?Because of this & other reason & the tactic that you use. I suspect you are a creationist. The hard evidence that the continents were once joined was quite hard for the creationist to explain. Tried ignoring it but eventually had to accept, now they make up their own stories without proof to back them up. Like you do.

OverlordShamala Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - He claimed that he studied & understands evolution, reason why he doesnt believe it. But made the claim science are searching for these creatures, the problem is that if he did study evolution, then he should know why these creatures cannot & never existed. Either his lying & he doesnt now anything about evolution or his just making an ass of himself. Ive seen him in FoxNews making that claim again.I wouldnt be surprised if really Neal designed Kirk Cameron's Crock-a-duck. heh...

Kable3141 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - debunked more like it

nealadamsdotcom Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Overlord Thinking ass backward makes no sense. Yes, dinosaur bones are quite hollow and porus, making them somewhat lighter. BUT more importantly ....WEAKER than modern mammals. PROOF-POSITIVE that dinosaur bones could never support massive dinosaurs in today's gravity. You guys are being idiotic , and not helping your arguments at all.

OverlordShamala Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - After rejecting the fact twice about the porous bones of the dinosaurs, now you except it, wonder why?Somehow you think because U'r an ass, you think everyone else is. Dinosaurs were weaker Now how in the world did Neal pull that big one from his ass? You have no idea about biomechanics how something can be sturdy while porous. A French engineer was inspired to build the Eiffel Tower because how biology solved the problem to be sturdy yet lightweight. Neal you are pulling on straws.

OverlordShamala Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - You're pathetic man.

jeanpauljh Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Why do you place so much trust in the "scientific data" of the US Navy, which supports the Plate Tectonic theory, whilst you disdain it?

nealadamsdotcom Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Overlord. Look, stupid, Everyone on the planet kmows about the relationship of Dinosaurs to birds. I have spoken of it here with regard to bone structure, migration patterns and evolution. ALLL know that hollow bones aid Birds to fly. Every textbook and natural history museum has cross-sections of such porus bones with fibrous structures inside to add support. Only YOU act like it's NEW NEWS to your monkey brain. No matter how sturdy a fillimented bone is, it's NOT STURDIER THAN A SOLID BONE!

nealadamsdotcom Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - jeanpauljh I "disdain" sloppy and undisciplined science. I accept good research and validated FACTS. I despise people's acceptance of THEORY as fact, especially when it defies logic, research, and the facts of other disciplines. The 'Pangea Theory' is exactly like the "Flat Earth theory" or the old assumption that the 'SUN orbited the Earth'. It is equally stupid! CONTINENTS CAN'T COME TOGETHER TO "ONE SIDE" OF THE EARTH! Are you people MAD? THIS FOLLOWS NO SCIENCE AT ALL!

microbot23 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - fit together perfectly? BULLCRAP !!!!

nealadamsdotcom Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - GUYS YOU...."BELIEVE" that the Earth, (Lord, save me.)caused all of it's land masses, BAR NONE, to travel and CONVERGE ON ONE SIDE OF THE EARTH,...IGNORE MASSIVE BASALTIC OCEANIC PLATE that would buckle up between these sections,...IGNORE THAT ALL, and JOIN TOGETHER, as if forced or SHOVED TOGETHER into ONE MASSIVE ISLAND, NO-LAND-ANYWHERE-ELSE-ON-EARTH? 2/3's OF THE WORLD....NOTHING but 2-3 mile deep ocean with 7-10 miles thick basalt? Are you ALL INSANE? THINK!

Diamonddavej Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Neal, the bones of dinosaurs were solid and resembled mammal bone, not bird bone.See - Fine structure of bone in dinosaurs, birds and mammals. JM Rensberger, M Watabe - Nature, 2000"After observation of detailed structural evidence for the origin of birds from dinosaurs, and in light of evidence that dinosaur bone tissue resembles the histology in mammals..."

Diamonddavej Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Neal, here is another good paper on he strength of dinosaur bones and their locomotion..."Strength indicator values of theropod long bones, with comments on limb proportions and cursorial potential. P Christiansen - Gaia, 1998"Just look at figure 2, it compares modern mammal and dinosaur bones, the graph shows that mammals and dinosaurs have the same general bone shape = they existed in the the same gravity.

Diamonddavej Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Neal, and finally, this guy calculated how the biggest Sauropod Dinosaurs walked...BURLY GAITS: CENTERS OF MASS, STABILITY, AND THE TRACKWAYS OF SAUROPOD DINOSAURS. DONALD M. HENDERSONThe biggest sauropods had no problem walking in 1 g (today's gravity).So there was definitely no need for lower gravity during the times of the Dinosaurs.

Jamzer4 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - so... if this is true how would you explain earthquakes and tidal waves?

Jamzer4 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - no wonder u sit on youtube with this theory and dont take it further...this theory has more holes in it than swiss cheese.

nealadamsdotcom Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Diamonddave. Engineers and scientists have argued for years. Each, without regard to any Growing Earth theory. You read a paper and it makes up your mind for you. All of these people should go home,...satisfied their debate is settled. Thanx Dave,...How about an 80 ton sauropod? That good too?Friend of mine, just died, Stan Winston was building a full size T-rex for Jurassic Park. He made the skeleton of Titanium. Each time he turned the upper torso and head,screaming metal and torqued twisted

nealadamsdotcom Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Diamonddave. no matter how Stan re-enforced his titanium skeleton, the torque was too great and the whole thing twisted.He finally built it in two parts, top and bottom. and braced the two on a timber structure and into the floor and wall. The film hid the center section with trees.

benthedragon Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - there is more to a body then just bone neal.there are muscles and ligament to distribute the force over a larger area then just one stress point.take your arm muscle, it does not connect at just two points, rather it connects at many distributing the force and moment over a larger area. servos connect at two points, focusing stresses in a few small spots. it is very common for people to not be able to recreate what nature has produced

Diamonddavej Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Neal; My friend met Stan here in Dublin a few years ago, a very nice guy, he chatted to young budding film makers.As for Dino's, if you think big Dino's were impossible, then you have to show proof, just saying so is not good enough. I'm looking at calculations & experiments that show they were possible in 1 g, they could be 100+ tons.Also, most Dino's were 10 to 20 tons, smaller then the biggest land mammal Baluchitherium, at 30 tons."The Size of the Largest Land Animal. JEI Hokkanen."

Diamonddavej Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Neal; Also, by the way - torque and twisting has nothing to do with the strength of gravity. Torque and twisting has to do with the horizontal movement of the Dino (e.g. looking Left and Right), not its weight pressing down on its feet.

Diamonddavej Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Neal, here is the paper I've been looking for, it was reported in TV, very interesting.If gravity was less than 1 g, the simulated Dino would not be able to walk or run. It proves Earth's gravity was 1 g during the times of the Dino's & the Earth didn't grow.Estimating dinosaur maximum running speeds using evolutionary robotics. WI Sellers, PL Manning - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007(p.s. my friend met Ray Harryhausen, I got mixed up).