Ancient Warriors - The Vikings 3/3 Videos

AimAnder Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - no... are you dane? i am, but no...

AimAnder Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - hold nu op med at lyve din klaphat..

joew01453 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - vilikes wernt buried they were burned, being buried was an insult

haalandg Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - norway and denmark had the real vikings! Sweden only had wannabes!

dani4leif2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - I agree if you talk about Stockholm swedes. But people of Gotland and Scania were also vikings.

Oleerkilass Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - no in Norway it was many rich vikinggraves, but they was robbed after tressurehunter came.One is in Aven, a place my father is from.

BalticViking2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - haalandg:Strange comment from someone who obviously dont know anything about vikings. The Swedes went east and founded Novgorod and Kiev. And Rurik from Uppland in Sweden also founded Russia. Most of the famous Varangian guard who served the Byzantine emperor personal body guard was Swedes.Cheers

haalandg Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - go have a wankthe norwegian and danish found iceland, greenland and the USA. But as you said that the swedes went east, sure but what i'm saying is that the norskies and danes were the most feared

BalticViking2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Hehe, well what I have read so was the Swedes realy bad boys also. And realy feard warriors and good traders and also statefounders .Cheers

turbofritz2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - dani4leif2 shut up, idiot!

dani4leif2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Novgorod were founded by Rurik. A Dane.

BalticViking2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - dani4leif2: Well strange that you say that he was a Dane. Becouse every evidence points towards Sweden. The Swedes was called Varyags and Rus in the east. The Danes went west and south hardly any Dane went east. In Sweden we have runestones that tell about this.

dani4leif2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - no you are wrong. most evidens point towards Rurik was a Dane. The Swedes were not called that.Also Ivar Vildfarmne were a Dane.Swedes just try to steal history from Danes.

BirkaViking Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - dani4leif2: I wonder who is trying to steel whos history. Wonder why you still write at vikings channels at all?? You didient even know that the vikings buried in graves. Its well known that the Sewedish vikings was called Rus and Varyags in the east. We have many archaeologich remains in Sweden from the east and many runestones tell about men who have died and traveld in the east.

BirkaViking Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - dani4leif2: But you in Denmark hardly have any runestone maby none that tells about travels to the east you also dont have much archaeologich remains from the east either, becouse you went west and south and hardly at all at the east. Cheers

JimmyReptile1 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Founded USA? That statement from you speaks for itself....... What do you know about who was most feared? Sweden, Danmark and Norway didnt look the same back then and you can count on that alot of swedes went to the west and south too.

atatyrknumber1 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - DONT FORGET NORWAY :>

Andreas040193 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Im a historican... first of all... The first 200 hundred years there was no Denmark norway or sweeden. It was clans... Second Denmark Norway Sweeden was the same porpurlation. The gretest sailors was from norway... Sweeden had the bigest poruplation. Denmark only once had hole sweeden... like sweeden only once had all denmark... and bothe denmark and sweeden had norway a lot of times... denmark and sweeden is the contrys in the world whit most war... 9 wars on 1 year (sorry i am bad ad englis)

Devilsnightforlife Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - We might have been the most warlike people with so many wars in a year. But never in the proportion of the ancient greeks, romans etc.Important to note that even though vikings are known for their berserkal ways, that is not how the majority of the people were. They were farmers and traders too. As a historican you must agree with me.

dani4leif2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - all the way to east??? LOL yes. Danish vikings were indeed in east to. And most historians and souces point Rurik AND Ivar vildfarmne to be a Dane.

dani4leif2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - There is absolutely no souces that says swedes were Rus. Know you will say YES! because Rus is devided from Roslagen, a swedish province. But the only known viking with the name Rurik were Rurik a Dane, king of Jutland and Frisian coast- witch were called RUSSTINGEN. There is no souces that tell Rurik was a Swede. So you just need to accept that the founder of Novogorod was a Dane.

BirkaViking Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - dani4leif2: You talk about a little chief in Denmark called Roric its not the same. Rurik was from roslagen (uppland) in Sweden. Why are u still comment in vikings channels when you dont know anything about them? You didient even know that the vikings buried in graves. As I have said before you in Denmark hardly have any runestone maby none that tells about travels to the east you also dont have much archaeologich remains from the east either, becouse you went west and south.

dani4leif2 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Rorik was a Dane you idiot. Why are you keep caliming otherwise. do you think history will change then.Gotland is there found many stuff from east, but also in Denmark and England.

bertafernandez Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - over there is so cool tha they don't have time to make any runestone jejeje .i like vikings so much i am cuban but mi parents are espaniards.i like they way to be they have not fear .i like their sagas pretty corageus

BirkaViking Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - dani4leif2: Why comment in viking channels when you dont know anything about the vikings? Its not only Gotland in Sweden who have much archaeologich remains from the east. You have much remains at Birka and hole Svealand in Sweden. I have hardly heard that at all that you have found much in Denmark from the east. And do you have any runestones who tells about men fallen in the east in Denmark=?