Added: Jul 7, 2008

From: Vizaar

Duration: 3:43

The Typhoon class submarine is a type of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine deployed by the Soviet Navy in the 1980s. With a maximum displacement of 48,000 tonnes, Typhoons are the largest class of submarine ever built. The NATO reporting name stems from the use of the word "typhoon" (тайфун) by Leonid Brezhnev in a 1974 speech while describing a new type of nuclear ballistic missile submarine. The Typhoon class was developed under Project 941 as the Russian Akula class (Акула), meaning shark. It is sometimes confused with other submarines, as Akula is the name NATO uses to designate the Russian Project 971 Shchooka-B (Щука-Б) class attack submarines.

Channel: People

Tags: beach  cox  k141thresher  lost  navy  nuclear  russian  sank  submarine  submarines  sunk  tommy  typhoon 


Rating: 4.89 (38 ratings)    Views: 25107' favoriteCount='53    Comments: 80

gun844 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - I dont care usa!You russians threatening hole europe to destroyed or counqerd.Im tired with russa.very much.you guys are barbarians nothing more.

petarst Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - i think that you are idiot , noyhing more nothing less !

HMSAstute Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Hey RussianPower666 what did the US ever do to you? And in case you forgot your gettin killed in Chechnya too and atleast our subs have decent reactors that dont explode when running at 115% power.

HMSAstute Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - SCJohnson77 Kursk exploded in 2001 after the the USSR disbanded so why would be blowing up a Russian submarine and risking nuclear war?

Unit987654321 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Actually those statistics are from the 90's now because of Putin the Russian economy is rising greatly. You should read today's statistics on Russia.

Unit987654321 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - The war in Chechnya is over, yes there are still suicide bombs like in Iraq, but a lot less. Russia is now not really fighting anyone anymore, just America is in Iraq, but America is now going to fight in Afghanistan.

HMSAstute Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Unit I wasn't talking to you Unit 987654321

HMSAstute Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Hey bub lest we forget our Ohio class SSBN carry 24 SLBMs armed with 12 warheads each of which carry a 475 kiloton nuclear warhead...bye bye Russia and my country's Resolution class are just as good.

EmperorofTerra Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - WOW, hey u know what ?? - Russia can do the same thing for a resoluation... and they can do it 2 times better. Believe me

macap21944 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Question, is there really any purpose for this submarine to be so massive? The purpose of a sub is to be small, and to remain hidden from the enemy. Such a large sub will be noticed very easily. Any thoughts?

AndrejKv Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - first of all, no SLBM is armed with 12 warheads, usually at least half to 80% are fake - just a false target (at least so are Russian Topol and Bulava missiles, I guess us are the same). And as far as I know, only US and Russia use MIRVs on their SLBM (ICBM MIRVs were prohibited in 80s)then, at least 1/3 to 1/2 of them will be probably destroyed by anti missile ground based systems (patriot, s400, etc)and finally, both us and russia are probably capable to wipe any country in any conditions.

nubbie1944 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - but this is a boomer, it is supposed to launch multiple SLBMs and act as deterrence.

matthewmanhorn Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - that's the technological wonder of the Typhoon class, it's incredibly silent and hard to detect despite its tremendous size

Katrandeep Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Submarines of a class of Ohio already for a long time have become outdated and there is a full dung in comparison with Typhoon!!!

HMSAstute Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - The Typhoon is older than half the Ohio's and the Ohio will be 10x harder to be taken down becuase they are guarded by 2 688i SSNs in war time the 688i SSNs are much better than any Russian SSN and the Seawolf and Astute are even better the 688i SSNs

Katrandeep Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - "Borey" !!!

spencermcgrew Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - are those little clear squares on the Sail windows for the open bridge when the seas are rough?

spencermcgrew Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Not when the commies zerg rush with ss-n-19 shipwreck missiles lol. The Carrier would be toast

spencermcgrew Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - well you guys went to Afghanistan in the 80s....

spencermcgrew Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - whats your point? are you advocating that Russia launch a first strike? Kinda pointless

midnightcaller77 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Watch for the History-I channel to rerun it's 2 hour documentary "The Russian Navy". It platforms the percise battle scheme that the Nimitz's would be sunk. Via huge Sunburn and Shipwreck anti-carrier missle barrages. Note: This attack scheme was employed when a tiny Soviet supplied Egyptian patrol boat sank the Israeli Fletcher class destroyer "Eliat" in the Mediterrain sea during the 1973 war. Ripping the huge ship in half. Naval history's only anti-ship cruise missile sinking..

utrpenilidstva Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - its biggest and most powerful submarine ever build....

snarfeater Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - maximum displacement of 26,000 tonnes IDIOT.

airwolfjan Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - did the russian government donated one of its older subs to the philipines??

Shoehanger Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - The 941-th project was the Soviet answer to the Jhio, actually