Added: Oct 11, 2008
From: rosserluke
Duration: 0:27
Intended as a joke!!By putting a funny side on the seriousness of the moon landing.If you believe Apollo was a fake, can use this as a sample of what you think could have been done. If you're an Apollo believer, this video only serves to demonstrate no such actual evidence exists.
Channel: Comedy
Tags: 11 1969 aldrin america apollo armstrong brilliant comedy conspiraces funny hoax landing moon nasa
Rating: 5.00 (2 ratings) Views: 994928' favoriteCount='1845 Comments: 2881
megaverse Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - To do something simple couldn't we use the damn telescope "hubble" to see the damn landing site and be done with this farce ? If it hasn't been done yet... Can't we see it or they just don't waste time on this shit ? Personnally if we see the images than there will still be some fuckers to tell that the images are tricked somehow ...it's just plain useless to move a multi million dollars telescope rather than use 35 cents bullets to rid ourselves of those fuck'n'morons, right ?
Killlaaaa101 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - PWND:D:D:D
mycutelittlepandas Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - lol lol. funny
TeeCee30xx Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Observatories use reflector plates placed on the Moon to determine it's exact position to Earth. Lasers pointed at the moon don't reflect back unless they're pointed at those plates. We could use a satellite to see the Apollo landing site, but it'd burn out the photosensitive cells on it. Telescopes like the Hubble have to be kept a certain number of degrees out of the range of the Earth, the Sun, and Moon for this specific reason, because they're too 'bright' for the photocells.
megaverse Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Yes I've seen the reflective plates on the moon. Mythbusters have a video here prooving their existence And the "hubble" is at 33 000km (or mile maybe ?) I think it's km just to stay stable bethween earth and "free space" But the site of apollo who would burn anything now that I really don't believe ...the telescope doesn't send light in it and there are angles you can take photos of there's even other specters you could check it with ...they just didn't do it.
csgillarjag Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - ammagad
ImOfNope Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - lol
sargemil Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - LMFAO
Gwenlj Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - I believe it, ROFL
Damanic84 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - great...! thats the truth!
op888op Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Having viewed all of the major world event conspiracy theory videos including space exploration, famous assassinations, attacks on states, alien abduction etc I believe that there remains a lack of credible evidence to sustain the conspiracies and an overwhelming amount of evidence to support reality. In the case of lunar exploration I find the pendulum test video irrefutable evidence dismissing the Moon conspiracy once and for all.
BlackVoid7 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Yeah, I think that would disprove it.Anyway, there's just as much evidence stating the landing was real as there is for the existence of climate change. In other words, mountains of proof.
skimmer1844 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - they never landed on the moon and the evidence as well as historical facts are there. for instance why did russia not go on the moon aswell just becoz u loose a race does not mean you dont cross the finish line afterwards. the van halen belt, the pictures with no view finder are to perfect and in focus, the flag, and also the spaceship on its first ever outing making a succesfull to and from trip on its first voyage. please, oh and why aint they been back since, come on people wake up.
Ravenflight104 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - 1. The Soviets tried to go, but their N-1 boosters had numerous launch failures. YouTube "N-1 Booster" for yourself. 2. Good photos proved they didn't go ??? 3."Van Halen Belt": no comment4.The flag motion: YouTube: Mythbusters - Moon Hoax Special )5. The Boeing 747, the Concorde, the Airbus 380 and the Austin Mini-Cooper were all sucessful on their first trips. Why? Because intellegent people planned and built them to be a success. Nine yrs. went into Apollo.Rest assured, I'm quite awake.
paralyzer0009 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Were talking about this in science, andnow looking at all the evidence layed on both sides, I think that we actually did go to the moon.
paralyzer0009 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - For the Van Halen belt, they didn't stay that long in it to get radiation. And if your taking a picture, which one would you want in a magizine? the blurry one, or the nice one? For the flag, NASA planned ahead and put a pole inside of it, and the only time it moved was when the guy was moving it. for spaceship, the modle was diffrent from the actual thing. And if you try to pull the no stars, we don't see stars in the daytime, and neither dose the moon.
paralyzer0009 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - We would take pictures of the site landing with the teloscope, if only if it was that easy!
Ravenflight104 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - paralizer: I agree with your statement whole-heartedly....except for one item.....Van Halen was a rocker, Van Allen is the name for the radiation belts. But I believe Eddie wanted to go to the moon...
astroroadshow Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Skimmer, you should do your research rather than guessing. Russia never went to the moon because their moon rocket kept blowing up. I take pictures all the time without looking through a view finder and they come out perfect - its called Practice, practice, practice.Flags can fly on the moon due to no air resistence to stop it flapping. They landed first attempt because Apollo 10 did everything Apollo 11 was going to do apart from the last 50,000ft - SIMPLE!
Ravenflight104 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Astro... have you had any encounters with the "Van Halen Belt" ?
astroroadshow Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Oh yes the 'Van Halen' belt ha! It doesn't exist off course. I have heard of the Van Allen Belt though as I guess you have too. Many spacecraft have passed through it and took measurements of this so called 'deadly radiation'. Well its not deadly if you only spend a few hours or even days passing through it. Perhaps if you were in it constantly, then it would be a health hazzard. But it would take a few months, not hours. I'm sure you are aware of this too. These berks don't learn.
sawsmith35 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - To skimmer1844: The Russians went to the moon? No they did not. You might want to start wearing an aluminum foil beanie.
Jeremyspurerage Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - I´ve found this video funny. I hope Mankind went to the Moon. But how can I know?
physchohead24 Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - lol
Sectorsophia Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - Haha, funny stuff!