Added: Jul 7, 2008

From: NoBrainsNoPlanes

Duration: 2:30

TAKE2

Channel: Education

Tags: 9/11  911revolution  bogus  brainwash  bsr  coffinman  g6199  illtype  jayceyjako  learning  media  obey  sleep  socialservice  we2ru 


Rating: 4.37 (19 ratings)    Views: 4076' favoriteCount='5    Comments: 31

AweSomo84 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - dude , WHO CARES? people died , gouverments trying to make a missele attack/planted bombs of their own , look like plains with terrorist in them attacked, so they could invade and begin the war on "terrorists"geth some brains dude or geth your self wel informed and use basic sence.

Sambucca Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - I'm sorry, your last post had such a confused usage of syntax I could hardly grasp what the fuck you were talking about.My question remains, at least for someone with more than a 6th grader's understanding of the English language.

AweSomo84 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - good for you

stukaville Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - google 'September clues' and watch all 8 parts.also download '911 Eye Witness' which has footage where the bombs can be heard going off before each tower collapses.After watching these videos I firmly believe that no planes hit the towers, only computer graphics. Pentagon struck by missle and the only real plane that day was United Airlines Flight 93, which was probably shot down.I wish it wasn't true, but the only conclusion possible after viewing all evidence is that its an inside job

Sambucca Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - No sorry, I can't accept the "TV trickery" theory. To do so is an insult to the thousands of people on the streets and in buildings surrounding the Trade Center who saw and recorded planes flying into the towers. Trickery may have been used later on to alter the appearance of the damage in widely published photographs, but there's no doubt winged vessles hit those towers. Wether or not they were manned, or were remote controlled is another thing.

sovereign777 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - I know that,you know that and so do they. Look at the level of English used in these videos. These people are well below average intelligence. They just want to pretend that they are a part of intelligent debate to make themselves feel better about their terribly underendowed minds.

sovereign777 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Nice shit heap of letters you created there.

sovereign777 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - now playners r thik as shitt.

chachalaca777 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - haha... thanks for the compliment

chachalaca777 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Sambucca... very few people saw what hit the second tower, and those that did were drilled into their brains through TV that they saw planes... its a simple theory, give all theories a chance if they have plausibility that is what makes good detective work. don't go for this disrespecting crap... we are all quite tired and pissed off at these attacks, and even more so having to come up with such conclusions, and more so having to tell people about it, so please just think about it.

Kapindur Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Precisely right my friend, no doubt these fools believe the lunar landings were a hoax as well. We can thank government run schools and the dumbing-down of the nation for this.

Kapindur Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - To flippantly state that "Wether or not they were manned, or were remote controlled is another thing" is an outrageous insult to the dead and their families. (Not to mention rational thought.) And what of those that were on cell phones talking with each other up to the moment of impact?

Sambucca Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - "what of those that were on cell phones talking with each other up to the moment of impact?"A study was conducted which proved that it would have been impossible to achieve a cellphone signal in a plane flying at that altitude, at that speed. The calls were faked by impersonators. This is how one played out: Caller: "Mom? This is Mark Brigham."Caller: (after a pause) "You believe me, don't you?If you're convinced by that well then there's little point in arguing with you.

sovereign777 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - 1:- No, a study WAS NOT carried out proving any such thing. A study WAS however carried out proving it was possible. 2:- Mark Brigham's mother conducted a tv interview in which she stated that he always introduced himself by his full name on the telephone - even to her.While it is an oddity, that oddity must then also be used in consideration when applied to his second statement.Your lack of knowledge on these simple points alone negates your baseless opinion.

warheadman Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Why do people think it was a missile? There were over thousands of people who saw a plane crash into the towers.

santhony74 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - "it zinged it"?

TheoryOfAll Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - 9/11 Truth is still not revealed

Ackdacka Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - where are they? and who are they? tell me this

warheadman Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - The people of New York, the people who were acutally able to get out of the Twin Towers, tourist at the Statue of Liberity, The people at the near by airport who saw the plane disapper from radar when it hit the tower, people who were watching all this on TV, and of course the news reporters who recorded all of this. DO you see what I mean yet?

NorCalShooter Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - My friends and coworkers saw it. You people are disgusting!

xAGUILARx Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - They think it was a missle here cuz they cant see shit from this angle

Ackdacka Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - its all tv...tv fakery

dpb64 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - 911 being an inside job will not make any sense to anyone that does not know about central banking.

wwecreator Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - so what if it was a fucking missle i dident help a bloody 747 jet flying into it tell me this why are you worring about missles when 3,000 people died that day

wwecreator Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - so what if it was a fucking missle it dident help a bloody 747 jet flying into it tell me this why are you worring about missles when 3,000 people died that day