Edwin Birdsong - Cola Bottle Baby Videos

koridatz Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - daaaaaah so daft punk only put a robot voice over these, yeah i always knew it DAFT PUNK SUCKS

petma01 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - What an idiot.You better realize that ALL house/hip hop music, is sampled from funk and soul...Ex. Stardust - Music Sounds Better With You / Room 5 - Make Luv

akikowolf Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - I have to respect the original, but I do like Daft Punk better. I grew up with Daft Punk, but now at least I know where it came from.

ikemkrueger Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - i think that too!

DrStrangeOpinion Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - I find most artists sample some stuff these days. I remember hearing the beat of Christina Aguilera's Candyman somewhere else.

rayzorium Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - The original artists are always credited. They didn't *go out of their way* to make sure everybody knows, but who does?

clipnapper Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - my point is that when a substantial amount of a previous musical piece makes up the basis of another piece, that new piece needs to be identified as a remix or version 2.0 kinda deal - know what I mean

rickpidgeon123 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - great song! awesome, i did a remix of this song and it sounds sweet check it out ( its on my channel), by the way awesome song!

ctautube Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Them funky nuggets can jammit.

M03D Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - daft punk rewrote the song and used the beat. DAFT PUNK IS A DJ HE ISN'T SUPPOSED TO MAKE HIS OWN BEATS

dmi33 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - so what. daft punk would have paid gross amounts of royalties to Edwin Birdsong, the songwriter or publishing company. Depends on who owns the song i guess.

clipnapper Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - True, that is not the best route either - maybe there could be some other model of paying the original artist like a lump sum?. Otherwise daft punk gets rich off someone else's creation and gives nothing back? Hardly seems fair...

gunnar045 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - well that song suck balls...but the beat is good i have to respect the original song but ..DAFT-PUNK did it better !DAFT-PUNK RULES THE NATION!

benlathim Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Daft Punk is more than one person and they aren't Djs they mostly play their own music.

AwesomeStopMotion Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - work it harder make it better

nocamine Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - you can't listen to this song after listening to Daft Punk, it sounds too slow

marissalovestrey Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - they're not djs.that's why they have turntables! yes, because djs don't have turntables.

marissalovestrey Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - is it just me, or does the instrumental sound weird without daft punk singing to it?

mincey57 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - .........................

BoomlalaMetrotab Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Good song, but I find the Daft Punk remix better.

BldDogg Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - u some kind a tard how can u say dj's doesn;t have turn tables???

hkkorly Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - Wasn't even a remix. They're completely different songs. Daft Punk merely sampled it.

leguminoso Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - if you listen to Stronger better you will see theres some beat in the music as well

leguminoso Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - not garbage, the beat is awesome and dp used it.

vongangster Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - I think this song should have received more credit, i.e. more people should have been informed that Daft Punk sampled this. I mean, for example when you hear the Kanye West version you don't hear people say "omg he ruined Edwin Birdsong". They say "omg he ruined Daft Punk".